stan wrote:
> Second this. That would be great. I dropped the size by 90% for a
> time by eliminating unneeded functionality, then some change came along
> that made my config file unstable, and I couldn't get back. This seems
> to be a problem generally, that there is a lot of dependency between
> options that isn't clear. A tool to create a "custom" kernel would be
> excellent. I suspect it would be a lot of work to create and maintain
> though, especially at the rate the kernel changes.
Unless you have some really valid reason (e.g. you need some kernel patch
which can't be built as an out-of-tree module), building custom kernels is
just a waste of time.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
