Re: Fedora 11 fail because of Anaconda :(

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" <wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200905@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Valent Turkovic <valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/fedora-11-fail-because-of-anaconda/

The x86_64 Preview doesn't run here.

The PPC port has also gone largely untested, because it's impossible
to install it on Apple-based hardware (and how many of us own any other
kind of PPC?), thanks to this still-unaddressed bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492154

I don't have any warm fuzzies about how good F11 is going to be;
I'm afraid that anaconda's instability has blocked a lot of the
testing we'd normally get.

My post about "custom install" is just a similar instance, I have been using the 32 bit install heavily, but the only available machines for 64 bit testing require a custom install to slide the new release into a complex existing disk configuration.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux