Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 7:55 PM
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I am using a FireGL 3400 at work and it is working
> well with F11 (right
> > now). There have been points during this rawhide when
> it didn't, but it
> > looks like but KMS and 3D will be working for the
> release (as they are
> > right now).
> 
> WARNING: This is only true for the V3400 (which is an
> rv530, equivalent to
> the Radeon X1600), not the V3600 the OP was considering
> buying (which is an
> rv630, equivalent to the Radeon HD2600). The V3600 does NOT
> have 3D support
> without proprietary drivers. See
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon
> for details.
> 
> > If you use an nVidia card you will need to use the
> propietary drivers to
> > get 3D acceleration.
> 
> ... which makes them a bad choice for Fedora.
> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 

Hi,

How about the  ATI Fire GL V7600 512MB,Dual Monitor DVI Capable graphics card? Same issues, or worse?

I really don't care about 3-D support: don't quite know what to do with it:-(

Best,
Trotter


      

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux