Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:12:41 +0200
• References: <49E31292.9090508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090413123035.GX13966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090413164944.73f9a721@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Michael Schwendt wrote:
> ??? What do vulnerabilities in GnuPG have to do with the signatures?

I think the OP was worrying about potential security issues during the
signature process.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
    • From: Michael Schwendt

• References:
  • Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
    • From: Bram_Gro
  • Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
    • From: Todd Zullinger
  • Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
    • From: Michael Schwendt

• Prev by Date: FC9 and MSI P4M900 - system-config-display hangs
• Next by Date: Re: Software request
• Previous by thread: Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
• Next by thread: Re: Using out-of-date GPG to sign Fedora releases...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread