On 04/03/2009 06:43 PM, Armin wrote:
IMHO EMACS is not better than Vi. They both have their uses and are both excellent. I stated that I much prefer EMACS for development over most other editors, including some IDEs. I like the ability in emacs to be able to edit multiple files simultaneously and display them in windows although vi also can edit multiple files too. I also prefer that emacs can run scripts, commands or compiles capturing results in windows.I am curious, what part of Emacs is better than Vi?
My personal preference is to use emacs for development, but to use vi for remote editing and quick editing of some files.
-- Jerry Feldman <gaf@xxxxxxx> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
