On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM, <homburg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:46:32 -0300 > "Armin Moradi" <feng.shaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Again, I am not knocking KDE4. However, it is a radical >> > departure from something that I have been using since >> > RH-9, possibly earlier. >> >> Ummm...to me, KDE 4.1 seems quite stable at this point, >> and has most of the features an average user would need. >> That's just what I think though. >> > The stability is not the issue. I don't want to get into > comparisons and create a stunningly tedious thread (like > the old KDE v. Gnome "discussions.") The issue is simpler; > KDE4 represents a totally different UI that presents a > migration challenge to "more experienced" users. That means either of a few things: 1. this is an over generalization 2. this is simply not true 3. I am rare case 4. I am not within the "more experienced" users category -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
