On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:05 +0200, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote: > Il giorno ven, 19/09/2008 alle 13.51 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha > scritto: > > > KDE 4 on F9 is a very different desktop from KDE 3.5 on previous > > versions of Fedora. The version on the distro CDs is buggy, so it's > > highly recommended to upgrade to at least 4.1 (using "yum upgrade"). > ummm this is not a good news. > And, before to release fedora 9, noone used KDE 4 and noone says that > it's buggy? > Unbelievable We've been over that already on this list. I recommend you read the large number of messages on this topic in the archives. > > You'll also need to relearn how to do certain things such as creating > > taskbar icons etc. Not all your configuration data will convert > > seamlessly so you might want to move .kde to an alternate name, then > > login in again and configure afresh. > I known that Kde 4 is very different from kde3, but I'm expecting that > something like an upgrade (kde3 -> kde4 or fedora 8-> fedora 9) should > care of this difference. Upgrading from one version of KDE 3.5 to the next (e.g. on F7->F8) frequently gave problems as well, so I'm afraid this is nothing new. > > However once you've made the transition there are no major problems. > Well, but for one that works with a computer, the transition have to be > as short as possible (minutes, or hours and not days and days). Fedora is an *experimental* system. If that doesn't meet your needs or expectations, maybe you should be using a different distro with higher stability guarantees (CentOS, RHEL, Ubuntu, ...) poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
