Re: 32bit vs 64bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram writes:
> 
>> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
>>> run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
>>
>> You don't have to do that. Fedora by default installs nspluginwrapper
>> which works with the 32-bit plugins on 64-bit arch. It also has the
>> advantage of adding more stability and security (via SELinux policy)
>> by separating the plugins into different process.
> 
> Maybe, but I was never able to get it to work. Installing
> nspluginwrapper didn't seem to have any effect. Flash never showed up as
> a registered plugin in Firefox, and there was absolutely no feedback
> whatsoever, regarding what the problem might be.
> 


Instructions for Flash in 64-bit Firefox

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Desktop.html#sn-KDE-Desktop

- --


  David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjQaeYACgkQAO0wNI1X4QH98gCgucIbOOkoPK+/KFFwywyUcrS6
zJcAnj++Kdwcoedb+RMxXd9yF/nML5J1
=bTy4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux