Re: The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul W. Frields wrote:

> You're absolutely right that it might not help attract more experts, but
> it certainly couldn't hurt to clearly let users know what to expect on
> this list, could it?  I don't take your statement to mean you don't want
> other helpers on this list, so if more people feel this is a good place
> to grow mutual support for using Fedora, I think you'd agree that's a
> worthy goal.

Anything that would bring in more experts would be excellent.

I must say, I have asked many queries on the list on many aspects of Fedora,
and had satisfying answers to almost all of them -
most of the useful answers, I should say, 
coming from a very small phalanx of experts.

Of the many lists and newsgroups I subscribe to,
I would put the fedora list and comp.text.tex equal first,
with sci.math unchallenged holder of the bottom place.




-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux