On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 19:11 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Why couldn't this much (little?) be told the world when it was discovered? > I believe the rampant speculation around this issue has done much more to > damage Fedora than anything that could have come out of this announcement. I agree that rampant speculation is bad, which is why we encourage people not to engage in it in the absence of facts. Nevertheless, open discussion *is* encouraged, and sometimes those two precepts simply come into conflict. Someone asked this question on FAB list, which I've answered in the following thread: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-August/msg00083.html -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
