On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:24 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:11:57 -0500
> "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Here, I think a compromise is necessary. If you're running a server, I
> > think you're competent enough to turn of NetworkManager (it was really
> > crappy a few versions ago). While I think there needs to be away to
> > have a network connection on boot, that seems, even to me, to be low
> > priority.
>
> But why am I being called on to be the one who needs additional
> competence? Why can't NetworkManager just say, "Oh look, this machine
> has a static IP, let's just start networking exactly the same way
> it always started". As long as people have to intervene to fix things
> after an improvement, I don't consider it an improvement.
>
This is how it's supposed to work in F9. If it's not, then there's a
bug somewhere.
>
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
