On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 17:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:01:32 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> > Last question, though, should I add a if 0?fedora exception to the SRPM
> > generator to keep the invalid-yet-working behavior for older releases?
>
> Well, do what works for you, but I still think it has never worked
> before. For example, RHEL5 kernel-devel currently provides
> kernel-devel-%{arch} = %{version}-%{release} too, with no .%{arch}
> appended to %release
>
I ended up forking the code to pre-F9 and >= F9.
Both RHEL 5.2 and 4.7 barfed on F9-compatible code so I decided to let
it stay as it is now.
Thanks again,
Gilboa
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
