On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 13:48 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:34:27 -0500, > Thomas Cameron <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey All - > > > > I am setting up a project for a buddy on a shoe-string budget and we > > need a site protected by SSL. Self-signed won't cut it. I looked at > > Why not? If you are interested in protection for the communications rather > than being involved with Verisign's protection racket then a self signed > certificate will work just fine. If you are worried about the latter, check > the list of CAs included by default in the browsers you expect your visitors > to be using and check out their prices. Because perception==reality. It will be publicly facing, and that whole "Firefox will not allow you to access this site without accepting that this is an untrusted CA" thing is off-putting for most members of the general public. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
