Re: Root exploit in the wild

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Root exploit in the wild
• From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:08:04 -0600
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <e8a30f560802110708q1acd9e23iff9e1569fb0d9343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Melville Theatre
• References: <20080210163423.b468e4e8.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200802110955.58637.lowen@xxxxxxxx> <e8a30f560802110708q1acd9e23iff9e1569fb0d9343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:08:00 -0600
inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd be surprised if those systems were running kernels that are this new.

Why?  Lots of outfits use RHEL and Centos for their server applications and one
assumes they would be keeping them up to date.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Root exploit in the wild
    • From: Michael A. Peters

• References:
  • Root exploit in the wild
    • From: Frank Cox
  • Re: Root exploit in the wild
    • From: Lamar Owen
  • Re: Root exploit in the wild
    • From: inode0

• Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 115 Doesn't Like iwl4965
• Next by Date: Re: kickstart (undocumented) changes
• Previous by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
• Next by thread: Re: Root exploit in the wild
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread