Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...

• To: chuck.carson@xxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
• From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:14:35 -0600
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <3be30bc50801201012u5373ac4dgf3917e82ae353db4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Melville Theatre
• References: <3be30bc50801200800x1a03379ubfe5c8a4bc955936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <479386A2.7090602@xxxxxxx> <3be30bc50801201012u5373ac4dgf3917e82ae353db4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:21 -0600
Chuck <chuck.carson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So CentOS is just the RHEL series re-branded? (no tinkering of
> packages and etc...)

That is exactly what it is.  Centos goes to great lengths to maintain 100%
binary compatibility with the "upstream distribution".

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

• References:
  • Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
    • From: Chuck
  • Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
    • From: Michael A. Peters
  • Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
    • From: Chuck

• Prev by Date: Fedora 8 slowness
• Next by Date: Re: Ahh, forget repo fusion :-).
• Previous by thread: Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
• Next by thread: Re: Is FC8 stable enough for what I am doing...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread