[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:02 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 16:40 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> Karl Larsen wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> 2. Next the small wimpy java 1.51 which is of no use to a serious 
> >>>>> java user should not be made available to the user.Instead there 
> >>>>> should be dummy /usr/java/default/bin/java file which will print out 
> >>>>> "Java not installed" if you press java in a Terminal. There needs to 
> >>>>> be a link between /etc/alternatives/java to /usr/java/default/bin/java.
> >>>> Most "Serious java users" ie corporations are using either 1.4 (as we 
> >>>> are at work) or 1.5, so stop speaking of something you know nothing 
> >>>> about. Hardly anyone is using 1.6 commercially yet. And they're the 
> >>>> people who are "serious users", not people trying to run applets in 
> >>>> their browsers...
> >>>>
> >>>    Why lie about what I KNOW? I tried to install jedit with the 1.5 on 
> >>> F8 and it just spit out error messages. Then I bit the bullet and 
> >>> installed what Sun Inc said is right and jedit works SUPER.
> >>>
> >>> That is fact not you GUESS.
> >> You are comparing 1.5 apples to 1.6 oranges.  The 1.5 you tried was not 
> >> Sun java, and jedit probably works just fine with Sun Java 1.5 as well 
> >> as the 1.6 you installed.
> > ----
> > what was the point you were trying make using Karl as proof?  LOL!!!
> 
> That this stuff should work as shipped.
----
are you saying that jedit doesn't work with shipped version of gcj ?

Craig


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]
  Powered by Linux