Re: Java problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 29, 2007 6:20 AM, David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Karl Larsen wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> >    It is interesting the hoops technical people jump through for
> > Political reasons. Java exists on a web page somewhere and it is
> > operating system independent. It is free to all users.
> >
> >    But the users need to know how to get it and mount it. If Fedora is
> > not going to use the real java in their distribution it is another
> > reason other versions of Linux are slowly being used by the public (I
> > have not seen any yet in my Wal-Mart).
> >
> >    In competition with Windows you do things that are not good from the
> > free software point of view. In my opinion we should change the
> > definition of free to include software available free but without source
> > code. In this group comes the driver for Nvidia hardware. I think what's
> > happening is a Political fix where someone is using the Nvidia software
> > which is NOT with a source code, and when a new kernel is ready they run
> > the Nvidia software and make the kernel driver(s), which are then put in
> > a rpm file and sent to users as a Update. It looks good but is it really
> > good?
>
>
> I just have to ask you Karl. What OS or Linux distribution natively
> includes Sun Java? What OS or Linux distribution natively includes the
> Nvidia drivers that you install?
>

Expand your limited horizon. Try openSUSE 10.3.

>
>   David


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux