Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 46, Issue 122

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Gijs wrote, On 12/12/2007 04:08 AM:
>> This is a generated email rambod kamaei. You do not have to reply to the
>> fedora-list Digest.
>> And if you would have read 4th paragraph, you would have also known, if
>> you would want to reply to it, that you would have to change your
>> subject line.

You can't tell him anything.  He is a PhD and a Linux Expert!

At 12:43 AM -0800 12/12/07, rambod kamaei wrote:
>Rambod Kamaei (PhD)
>CCIE, CCNP, Linux Expert.


At 10:25 AM -0500 12/12/07, Todd Denniston wrote:
>I wonder how many RFC's would be violated if list servers would have the
>ability (list configuration item) to look at the emails sent to it, and if an
>email had less than say a 1-5% (of a normalized form of the email) difference
>to one of the list's own Digests (from the last few weeks), either reject the
>email or only send the difference on to the list, especially if subject email
>had the subject "Re: thislist Digest, ThislistsVolIssuePolicy".

None, as any mail server may reject any message due to local policy (RFC
2821 response code 550).  Submit a patch!  Probably only messages that are
a reply to a digest message need inspecting, and only the referenced digest
message should need comparing with.
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux