Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
• From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:43:47 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1197067148.12503.1.camel@naxos>
• References: <20071207145439.10f5716b@zooty> <1197067148.12503.1.camel@naxos>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:39:08 +0000
John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/

I know what it is, I don't know why there were both
.x86_64 and .i386 versions of the rpm installed. A 32
bit wrapper to run 32 bit plugins seems completely
idiotic :-).

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
    • From: Todd Zullinger
  • Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
    • From: Tim

• References:
  • nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
    • From: Tom Horsley
  • Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
    • From: John Austin

• Prev by Date: Re: Audio Problems with VLC and Fedora 8
• Next by Date: Re: Best way to copy /usr to different partition?
• Previous by thread: Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
• Next by thread: Re: nspluginwrapper.i386? Huh?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread