On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 12:34 -1000, Dave Burns wrote: <snip> > Is this a good idea or just the livna site's self-promotion? I am > tempted to think this is pretty official, since it comes from > fedorafaq.org. But if it was a good idea, why not put it in the > default fedora setup? Confused. > Livna can *not* be included in the default fedora setup because it includes software that either has potential patent conflicts (mp3 support) or isn't open source (ATI/nVidia binary drivers). If you care about patent problems or want your system to be open source software only, don't install Livna. If you don't care and you want mp3 support or binary drivers, go ahead and install it. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
