On 10/18/07, Chris G <cl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:16:38AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > Karl Larsen wrote: > > > > > I am pleased your many computers were not effected by the selinux > > > update. I have no idea what is special about my computer but it is and > > > I, just an old EE am not capable of figuring out what it is so I can run > > > selinux. A sure fix EVERY time is to turn off selinux, relabel selinux > > > and forget selinux. I am wondering why I have to relabel the stupid thing. > > > > You keep on telling us you are turning off SELinux, > > and then a week later you say what problems SELinux is causing, > > so you are turning it off ... > > > > Why not turn it off for good, and stop worrying us? > > > I didn't even install it but I still get SELinux security messages in > my log file. I suspect that "turning it off" will have even less > effect than not installing it to start with. SELinux is part of the kernel. If you don't like it, form a SIG and produce a kernel sans SELinux, or use a distro which doesn't have it. Or easier yet, just disable it. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
