Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
• From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:21:37 +0100
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <46D75B1E.1090700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
• References: <cdc5a80c7887.7887cdc5a80c@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <46D6EB55.2060901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070831004453.04b7df1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46D75B1E.1090700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Care to elaborate on that last statement?  Are you talking about the disks
> themselves or the IDE interface or ????  If "IDE" disks are unreliable then
> what disks are reliable?

The disks themselves. I've yet to meet a reliable disk, ever year or two
one dies on me.

Alan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: Tim
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: Rick Stevens

• References:
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: ke5c
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: Andy Green
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: Alan Cox
  • Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
    • From: Ed Greshko

• Prev by Date: Re: LABEL's
• Next by Date: Re: DD not working
• Previous by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
• Next by thread: Re: LVM or FS:EXT3?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread