Hi On 6/10/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Dotan Cohen wrote: >> >>> You should probably post this to bugzilla and the devel list as well.
>>> You'll save somebody a lot of work. Thanks. >> Wouldn't be useful. If ATI doesn't support the latest Xorg provided in >> Fedora 7 there isn't much Fedora developers can do about it. > > Correct me if I'm wrong and out of line here, but if the latest fglrx > packages doesn't work with F7, can't the 3rd party repo maintainers > remove it in favor of an older package that does work (only in their F7 > repos)? Why isn't this a viable solution? I thought that the point of > having 3rd party repos was to help provide packages that worked. I > realize you can argue whether the fglrx package is broken or that Fedora > 7 breaks it, but if the previous packages work, let's package them up > for F7 until ATI fixes fglrx! Afaik the older ATI drivers only work with older versions of Xorg so your solution does not work.
Well, sort of. Latest fglrx version is able to use the new Xorg version numbering and actually works with Xorg 1.2.something. Does not work with F7 1.3.something.
Rahul
Fabio
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
