On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 04:46:25PM -0700, Peter Connolly wrote: > >... It appears > >that just like the DOS packages of long ago you NEVER want a simple > >number. DOS 4.0 was buggy and bad. DOS 4.1 was a keeper. > > MS-DOS 4.0 ***June 1988*** > MS-DOS 4.01 ***December 1988*** (Wikipedia) > > 29 years of living on the bleeding edge. Savage! Check back in 6 months. Ah, your biting sarcasm would have a much sharper edge if you could subtract correctly. Or use a caculator correctly. -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
Attachment:
pgpZscAKL93K7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
