Tim wrote: > > I dare say that, if you didn't mind a plain HTML output, you could have > gotten away with making your own header file of: > > <html><title>logwatch output</title><body> > > And a footer file of just: </body></html> > > It's been my experience that much of the HTML trickery gets ignored in > mail clients, anyway. For example, although Evolution supports HTML, it > doesn't seem to care about how it presents it. > Shouldn't that be: <html><head><title>logwatch output</title></head><body> or <html> <head> <title>logwatch output</title> </head> <body> I always thought the <title></title> directive had to be in the headers section... Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
