Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
• From: ellis@xxxxxxxxxxx (Rick)
• Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 02:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
• Cache-post-path: no.spam!unknown@xxxxxxx
• Organization: S.P.C.A.A.
• References: <20070221223757.GB2983@xxxxxxxxx> <cone.1172118125.215471.3294.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1172195033.667831@xxxxxxx> <20070223014819.GA4339@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

In article <20070223014819.GA4339@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Matthew Miller  <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>If not, what are the issues you've had?

Most of the issues have been files that are in both the i396
and x86_64 packages. Often -devel packages are the culprits.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
    • From: Tom Horsley

• References:
  • ESR: Goodbye Fedora
    • From: M. Fioretti
  • Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
    • From: Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
    • From: Rick
  • Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
    • From: Matthew Miller

• Prev by Date: Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
• Next by Date: Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
• Previous by thread: Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
• Next by thread: Re: ESR: Goodbye Fedora
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread