Re: clamav-0.90

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: clamav-0.90
• From: Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:23:42 +0100
• In-reply-to: <20070219140946.GC623@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1171637656.4833.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0a3301c75226$44d6c830$0225a8c0@wednesday> <20070219093114.GF11705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1171885686.3701.145.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070219140946.GC623@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Il giorno lun, 19/02/2007 alle 15.09 +0100, Axel Thimm ha scritto:

> I'm not sure what you mean. I don't think that livna has clamav,
Ooopss!
I'm sorry :-( ... I have confused Livna with ATrpms.

-- 
Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx>

• References:
  • clamav-0.90
    • From: Dario Lesca
  • Re: clamav-0.90
    • From: jdow
  • Re: clamav-0.90
    • From: Axel Thimm
  • Re: clamav-0.90
    • From: Dario Lesca
  • Re: clamav-0.90
    • From: Axel Thimm

• Prev by Date: Re: Kaffiene question re audio
• Next by Date: Re: How should I file RFEs on RH's Bugzilla?
• Previous by thread: Re: clamav-0.90
• Next by thread: Re: clamav-0.90
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread