Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
• From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:35:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <4eb40c9b64fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <4eb3854153fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acfad57e0702111055v5d9fbe0r719e4409de500cda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45CF6BDC.1010807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45CF7009.3040408@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4eb40c9b64fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:09:01PM +0000, Mark Fraser wrote:

 > BTW in one forum I went to, it said change the config.h to autoconf.h which

autoconf.h is implicitly included.  Neither it, nor config.h have needed
to be #include'd for about 18 months (at least).

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

• References:
  • Compiling rt2500 drivers
    • From: Mark Fraser
  • Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
    • From: Chris Mohler
  • Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
    • From: Martin Marques
  • Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
    • From: Patrick Boutilier
  • Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
    • From: Mark Fraser

• Prev by Date: Re: NTP problem
• Next by Date: Re: OT: can antennas for wireless Internet cause damage to health?
• Previous by thread: Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
• Next by thread: Re: Compiling rt2500 drivers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread