Tim: >> For some people, having it running certainly causes a performance >> loss. Whether that's down to SELinux, itself, or the logging, I've >> not experimented with. Lyvim Xaphir: > Have you been able to get around the lag with selinux=0? Not that I want to be rude, but what other method do you think I used to determine it was faster without SELinux? You can't remove it, as we've established. And I must have disabled it to be able to tell that there was a difference between having it and not. So my tests were between having it enabled and not. I can't think how else I would have tested that. Yes, it did make a significant difference. But I've put up with the slow down, as that machine was an internet accesible WWW server. I'd rather play safe. -- (Currently testing FC5, but still running FC4, if that's important.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
