Re: The mystery of lm-sensors

• To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: The mystery of lm-sensors
• From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:59:37 +0000
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <ekeos1$pfs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <ekcbnf$83v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4569B336.7010100@xxxxxxxxxxx> <ekeos1$pfs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

On Monday 27 November 2006 13:23, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> At least lm-sensors gives some response, even if it is incomprehensible ...
>
Better results than I can get for *my* mobo - I have 
temp1=-1.0 and 
temp2=0.0 :-)

Anne

• References:
  • The mystery of lm-sensors
    • From: Timothy Murphy
  • Re: The mystery of lm-sensors
    • From: Andy Green
  • Re: The mystery of lm-sensors
    • From: Timothy Murphy

• Prev by Date: Re: FC 6 issues
• Next by Date: Re: Open Office Problem
• Previous by thread: Re: The mystery of lm-sensors
• Next by thread: Password Storage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread