On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:35, Craig White wrote: > ---- > I believe that the FSF / FSLC was more concerned with a potential > violation of section 7 of the GPL (v2) but since they (Eben Moglen) have > been invited to review the complete contractual agreement... > > http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2168151/novells-opens-microsoft > > we are certain to know what the official position of the FSF/FSLC is > going to be. But my point is that _if_ the Novell agreement is necessary for distribution, then GPL distribution is already illegal for everybody, not just Novell. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
