Re: Webcam choice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That will probably be kernel-devel package.  However, on mine it points
to /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-xen-i686
but i have 
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/ from the devel package.  So
there is some fun waiting when I try to compile new kernel modules.


On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 20:15 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 19:57, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 22:05 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > This old one is a Philips, identified as a 740. lsmod confirms that
> > > pwc is loaded. I can't use it like this, so I'll have to see what I
> > > can do about getting another. I had wanted to avoid usb 1.1 webcams,
> > > thinking that a usb2 one would be better, but I can't find any
> > > compatibility reports for any of the ones I've found.
> >
> > Anne, which driver are you using? 
> 
> The Philips uses pwc.  It gets a picture, but not a usable one.
> 
> > Mine worked like a bloomin' charm 
> > until yum upgraded the kernel and things went wonky. Now I'm finding a
> > problem with my glibc install that has me baffled. Might be why I can't
> > roll that module.
> >
> > But, I used gspca from:
> >
> > http://mxhaard.free.fr/download.html
> >
> > Worked right the first time. You might want to try that one. It claims
> > to be the Swedish Survival Knife of webcam modules. All my camera
> > applications recognized and acknowledged the module it built. My webcam
> > was claimed to be not supported at all, and this enabled it. Ric
> >
> Maybe my brain has given up under the strain.
> 
> [anne@david gspcav1-20060925]$ make
> make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build 
> SUBDIRS=/home/anne/Downloads/gspcav1-20060925 CC=cc modules
> make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6/build: No such file or directory.  
> Stop.
> make: *** [default] Error 2
> 
> I wondered if it was a permissions problem 
> on  /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6/build, but it isn't as simple as that, 
> apparently.
> 
> ls -al /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6/build
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 Nov  1 
> 12:15 /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6/build -> ../../../usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i586
> 
> This shows the link flashing red, which I presume spells trouble.  The only 
> guess left to me is that I'm missing kernel headers, or some such.  What 
> would the package be called?
> 
> Anne
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- 
Warren Sturm                    Senior System Administrator
Mount Royal College             +1 403 440-6485
4825 Mount Royal Gate           
Calgary, Alberta
T3E 6K6

This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which
it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or
privileged information. Please contact the sender immediately if you
are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy,
distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received
in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux