Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
• From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:38:30 +0000
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610310944260.21241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <4546CAC5.4080406@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4546E349.6010902@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610310944260.21241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.9.4

On Tuesday 31 October 2006 07:53, Tarhon-Onu Victor wrote:

>  	Well, that's an LVM volume. You have to run first pvscan (or lvm

Another way to come at it if you had enough of LVM:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-June/msg03297.html

-Andy

• References:
  • e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
    • From: M. Lewis
  • Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
    • From: M. Lewis
  • Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
    • From: Tarhon-Onu Victor

• Prev by Date: Re: NVidia from Livna seems to have broken X
• Next by Date: fetchmail and not delivering cc + bcc mail
• Previous by thread: Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
• Next by thread: Re: e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread