Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
• In-reply-to: <1158178737.18491.130.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1158160773.16343.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <61344.70.61.179.202.1158162218.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1158164091.16343.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1721.70.61.179.202.1158174426.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <ee9mo6$qm5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1158178737.18491.130.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [CVS]

Ric Moore wrote:
> I agree to disagree as well... we owe a ton to RedHat and their
> developers, so if they want to accrue payback from the list, especially
> from those running heavy duty servers, no prob. My two cents, Ric

Why would they expect RHEL feedback on a Fedora list?  There are RHEL
lists for that.

-- 
William Hooper

• References:
  • Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: taharka
  • Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: taharka
  • Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: Rex Dieter
  • Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
    • From: Ric Moore

• Prev by Date: Re: unrar and multi-file volumes
• Next by Date: Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
• Previous by thread: Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
• Next by thread: Re: Red Hat Users Invited To Test RHEL 5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread