Beartooth wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:09:04 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I sympathize with the American posters here who know no better than to
use American toys that call themselves dictionaries. The OED which is a
real English dictionary does not define fuze directly but simply refers
to fuse. The definition of fuse(n.) includes something to break an
electrical circuit and something to ignite explosives, so that should
settle it.
Point of information here : the makers of dictionaries have no pipeline to
any gods of language, if such there be. What they do is go out and study
usage, then report what they find.
[snip]
In this context, yes. However, this is emphatically not universally
true. There are dictionary/language standards groups which do assume
authority to dictate actual usage in other languages. In particular,
Spanish and German are both dictated that way. Not too long ago, there
were "official" changes to both of those languages (which I have some
facility in) which I disagreed with. One letter was elided from Spanish
(sad day for me, now spanish spelling is "weird" like that in English
in some ways) and German changed the official spellings of words
with triple letters in them (like ,,stillliegen") to only have double,
(,,stilliegen") and some minor changes in orthography regarding the
sharp "s". So now German has some more "funny" rules for pronunciation.
"Stilliegen", as spelled, should be pronounced with a glottal stop
after the Ls. But that's not the way the word is pronounced. So,
german spelling (which is much but not an enormous lot better than
english spelling) has some more blemishes on it.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
