Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:31:53 +0930
• In-reply-to: <44E417B4.8030909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Penguins United Against Mega-Monopolists
• References: <44E21A06.6030208@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E2629D.4000606@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E35D58.9030001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <44E3BA8C.6090608@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1155798557.2518.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44E417B4.8030909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tim:
>> FC3 used up2date, by FC4 it wasn't really usable.  FC4 uses YUM.

Ed Greshko:
> OK...they probably went to xorg-x11 by then too, huh?

Yes, FC4 moved from XFree86 to Xorg.

-- 
(Currently running FC4, occasionally trying FC5.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

• References:
  • glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Philip Walden
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Ed Greshko
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Philip Walden
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Ed Greshko
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Tim
  • Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
    • From: Ed Greshko

• Prev by Date: Re: [OT} chilli wasRe: For sale
• Next by Date: Re: mouse wheel problems
• Previous by thread: Re: glx not loading even though the log file shows no errors
• Next by thread: adding packages from original install location
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread