On Saturday 01 July 2006 17:46, Jim Cornette wrote:
> Bob Goodwin wrote:
> > Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> >> Bob Goodwin wrote:
> >>>> Your experience is not unique. You can a) file a bug report ("a good
> >>>> thing"), b) exclude nfs-utils and update the remaining packages, c)
> >>>> wait a day or two and hope that it is a repository synchronization
> >>>> problem or d) do nothing.
> >>>
> >>> No amount of "exclude=anything" seems to help?
> >>>
> >>> yum update --exclude=*nfs* --exclude=*xine*
> >>>
> >>> It looks to me like the only option is "do nothing" and wait?
> >>>
> >>> --> Running transaction check
> >>> --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils
> >>> --> Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 for package: xine-lib
> >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 is needed by package
> >>> xine-lib
> >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package
> >>> nfs-utils
> >>
> >> I don't know about xine updates, however, for FC-core updates,
> >> excluding both
> >> nfs-utils-lib and libgssapi is needed.
> >
> > "Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.24 is needed by package
> > xine-lib
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
> > "
> >
> > I did yum remove xine without success, finally had to yum remove
> > xine-lib after which
> > yum -y upgrade --exclude=nfs-utils* --exclude=libgssapi* allowed the
> > update process to
> > run to completion.
> >
> > Now to re-install xine ...
> >
> > Bob Goodwin
> >
> >> NOTE: This nfs-utils problems is known to FC-devel or FC6T1 users from
> >> several weeks ago.
> >> I don't know why this problem was not checked before releasing these
> >> updates......
> >>
> >> See:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196359
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197219
> >> and
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-June/msg00933.htm
> >>l
>
> There are many threads on the list currently with different subjects.
> They all reference the same problem caused by the rc in the package name.
>
> The naming of the current rpm has an oddity in its name which makes it
> appear newer than the package that is actually newer. Check the below
> posting from the fedora-test-list. If you are running updates-testing,
> the list has much value.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-June/msg00404.html
>
> This one case where the --nodeps option to rpm is used with good reason.
> :-)
>
> Jim
>
> --
> In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.
Hi Jim. I'm using Apt on FC5. I'm on dialup, and there are still some 2h 30m
to go on the updates download, but apt-get dist-upgrade indicates that it's
going to remove nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5). The packages to be
installed/removed etc are below.
The following packages will be upgraded
NetworkManager (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
NetworkManager-glib (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
NetworkManager-gnome (0.6.2-2.fc5 => 0.6.3-1.fc5)
autofs (4.1.4-27 => 4.1.4-29)
glx-utils (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
gnupg (1.4.3-2 => 1.4.4-2)
httpd (2.2.0-5.1.2 => 2.2.2-1.0)
k3b (0.12.14-0.FC5.2 => 0.12.15-0.FC5.1)
lash (0.5.1-2.rhfc5.ccrma => 0.5.1-5.fc5)
libX11 (1.0.0-3 => 1.0.0-3.FC5.0)
libX11-devel (1.0.0-3 => 1.0.0-3.FC5.0)
libgssapi (0.7-2.1 => 0.9-1.FC5)
mesa-libGL (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mesa-libGL-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mesa-libGLU (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mesa-libGLU-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mesa-libGLw (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mesa-libGLw-devel (6.4.2-6 => 6.4.2-6.FC5.3)
mkbootdisk (1.5.2-5.2 => 1.5.2-7)
mutt (1.4.2.1-6.2.1 => 1.4.2.1-6.3.fc5)
nfs-utils-lib (1.0.8-3.1 => 1.0.8-4.FC5)
python (2.4.3-4.FC5 => 2.4.3-8.FC5)
python-devel (2.4.3-4.FC5 => 2.4.3-8.FC5)
qt4 (4.1.4-1.fc5 => 4.1.4-4.fc5)
qt4-devel (4.1.4-1.fc5 => 4.1.4-4.fc5)
shared-mime-info (0.17-1.fc5.1 => 0.17-1.fc5.2)
tetex (3.0-19.fc5 => 3.0-20.FC5)
tetex-fonts (3.0-19.fc5 => 3.0-20.FC5)
xorg-x11-apps (1.0.1-2 => 7.0-1)
xorg-x11-server-Xorg (1.0.1-9.fc5.1.1 => 1.0.1-9.fc5.5)
xorg-x11-server-debuginfo (1.0.1-9.fc5.1.1 => 1.0.1-9.fc5.5)
xorg-x11-xdm (1.0.1-1.2 => 1.0.1-2)
xorg-x11-xfs (1.0.1-4 => 1.0.1-4.FC5.0)
xorg-x11-xinit (1.0.1-2 => 1.0.1-2.FC5.0)
xorg-x11-xtrans-devel (1.0.0-3.2 => 1.0.0-3.2.FC5.0)
The following packages will be REPLACED:
qt4-config (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5)
(by (4.1.4-1.fc5)
qt4) ()
The following packages will be REMOVED:
nfs-utils (1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5)
The following NEW packages will be installed:
qt4-x11 (4.1.4-4.fc5)
35 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 replaced, 1 removed and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 125MB of archives.
After unpacking 103kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n (which is now yes)
Whether Apt has worked around this problem, I don't know yet. I'll update when
the download finishes.
Nigel.
