On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 12:06 -0400, Sean wrote: > Well it makes sense to me that if you're building a program that > relies on a library, that it is a derived work of that library. > But i'm not a lawyer. Does this mean you agree with SCO's claim that the portions of Linux that were originally written by others but as part of unix are thus covered by the unix copyright and terms? > No, the GPL has fostered competition and kept Microsoft honest. Really? Do you think Microsoft has been honest? > However, there are many many more instances where proprietary software > is unavailable to people. What functionally do you find missing? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
