On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 10:51, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Right on spot. Everything installation was a bandaid over inflexible > package management post installation to the point that the users felt > that just selecting everything would save them a lot of potential pain > later. The part about saving time is still probably true. Who wants to be in the middle of something and run into missing programs needed to complete it? And if you don't have at least one machine with 'everything' installed, how are you supposed to find out what is available and if you like it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
