Re: Yum better than RPM?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Yum better than RPM?
• From: Brian Mury <brianmury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:43:32 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1141241811.2133.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1141238692.2133.93.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603011110530.7809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00603011122w421c7434oc1417649c471eab2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1141241811.2133.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:36 +0100, Albert A. Modderkolk wrote:
> Who is the OP?

You are. OP = Original Poster

• References:
  • Yum better than RPM?
    • From: Albert A. Modderkolk
  • Re: Yum better than RPM?
    • From: alan
  • Re: Yum better than RPM?
    • From: Kam Leo
  • Re: Yum better than RPM?
    • From: Albert A. Modderkolk

• Prev by Date: Re: System Crash Troubleshooting
• Next by Date: Re: Yum better than RPM?
• Previous by thread: Re: Yum better than RPM?
• Next by thread: Re: Yum better than RPM?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread