-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike McCarty wrote: > > Well, Recommended Standard 232 was one of those which had > much more in it than most people needed, so a lot of the > pins got hijacked. It was the Standard people loved to > violate. A disc drive interface is (1) less generally > useful and (2) less amenable to hijacking for other > purposes. > > Mike Over reading many specs, I've found that they are to be used as guidelines more than definitive absolutes. Some manufacturers take the definitions literally, and some take a more liberal approach to the specifications. - -James -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD/1XkkNLDmnu1kSkRAuAiAJ9Hrzzf6Mera1L/Hfof2rPkLe9ldQCcDZ2n CJog9ZRl3LFxbgyobuP1IW0= =AkwW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net
