Re: FC4 Pine replacement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FC4 Pine replacement?
From: Jonathan Underwood <j.underwood@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:57:18 +0000
In-reply-to: <cone.1135984252.640370.21801.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2baac6140512261209x3a7e4376md9b307509f511a04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512270749060.32092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512261823520.31636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dp3qtm$43m$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1135984252.640370.21801.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

As an aside, cone is available from fedora extras, and is quite nice.Not as featureful as pine though.
Such as?

Hi Sam - sorry, wasn't meaning to be critical of your excellent coneMUA, which incidentally is what I currently use in preference to pine,and I am extremely grateful for your efforts.

However, to answer your question, I haven't found a way to integratecone with an ldap directory, which is possible with pine. Not a big dealthough.


Jonathan.

Prev by Date: create SSL cert via script
Next by Date: Remote GUI
Previous by thread: create SSL cert via script
Next by thread: Remote GUI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]