[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Disk defragmenter in Linux

Robert Nichols wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:

Surely those who argue that ext3 does not get fragmented
during install don't think that 248 extents is "not
significant fragmentation".

While that almost certainly constitutes "significant fragmentation"
it probably has very little effect on performance.  It _would_
affect performance if that file were being read sequentially, but
ELF binaries don't get loaded that way.  Individual pages are
read in via demand paging, and the next page needed could be from
anywhere in the file.

I thought we were discussing ext3 and what could happen with it.
Someone was claiming that ext3 was inherently immune or
nearly so to fragmentation.

So, back to the OP's question: Where is there/why isn't there
a defragmenter for ext3?

This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

[Home]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]     [Plasma TV]     [Lil the Pill]     [Squid Users]

Powered by Linux

  Web www.spinics.net