Re: Disk defragmenter in Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



jdow wrote:
From: "Mike McCarty" <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The fragmentation for your emacs is unbelievably high. I did not find anything yet fragmented in the hundreds, let alone several hundred extents. Are you using LVM? My system is setup in traditional partitions. LVM usage "seemed" slower in responsiveness, so I assumed it was more in fragments


Why "unvelievably"? Do you mean that you do not believe what my
system says? Or that you do not believe my e-mail? Or that you
find that it stretches your imagination? Or what?


Perhaps this is an Americanism. It is higher than one would believe

Well, though my first language is not English, it is my preferred
language, which I've been speaking since I was about 4 or so.
And I was born in and grew up in the USA. Native Texican.

in a "fantasy story" but perforce must believe when seen in real life.

This is what I meant by "stretches your imagination".

It does seem rather ridiculously or unbelievably or unrealistically or fish story high. But you have the numbers right in front of you.
So unbelievable or not it can happen. It certainly is fascinating
that it has.

I was, well, shocked. OTOH, someone stated that extents and
fragmentation are not the same, as different extents may
well be contiguous on disc.

How full is that file system?
{^_^}

$ df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5              7633264   4681896   2563620  65% /
/dev/hda3                99075     24602     69358  27% /boot
none                    124044         0    124044   0% /dev/shm

Hmm, anyone can explain what /dev/shm is? And why it's 62MB?
This is a dual-boot WinXP/Linux.

# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77545 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1               1        8625     4346968+   b  W95 FAT32
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda2   *        8626       60915    26354160    7  HPFS/NTFS
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda3           60916       61118      102312   83  Linux
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda4           61119       77545     8279208    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/hda5           61119       76505     7755016+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6           76506       77545      524128+  82  Linux swap


Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux