On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 05:16:47PM -0500, Devon Harding wrote: > Mutt seems better to me. > Now that I have joined others in recommending mutt as a replacement to pine let me share two problems with mutt: 1. It does not respect the standard that says in a reply everything after: <CR> -- <CR> will be deleted in the reply. 2. It it somewhat clumsy to use ipop and imap with mutt. Otherwise mutt is simpler than pine to use in my opinion. -- ======================================================================= Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life. -- Dave Butler ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University telephone: (210)-999-7484
