Re: NAT in FC4

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: NAT in FC4
• From: Robert Spangler <bms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 02:20:51 -0500
• In-reply-to: <439244C1.5080205@xxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <200512010700.jB170bXr027208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16de708d0512010053p47ff812asd7e6acb88d53e293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <439244C1.5080205@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.8.2

On Saturday 03 December 2005 20:22, Richard England wrote:

>  How do you get around the the disabling of Samba on systems using
>  Firestarter?  Or is that not a problem on FC4?  I encountered it in FC3
>  and couldn't find a workaround, at the time.

I never had this problem when playing with Firestarter.  Are you sure you had 
all the correct ports open?


-- 

Regards
Robert

Smile... it increases your face value!

• References:
  • NAT in FC4
    • From: Rapid Sun
  • Re: NAT in FC4
    • From: Arthur Pemberton
  • Re: NAT in FC4
    • From: Richard England

• Prev by Date: Re: Compusa 54MB Wireless G PC Card for Fedora4
• Next by Date: kernel designations question
• Previous by thread: Re: NAT in FC4
• Next by thread: Re: NAT in FC4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread