[info] x86_64 32bit binary browser plugin crap

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: [info] x86_64 32bit binary browser plugin crap
• From: Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:08:51 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=E745A8rfEjN+3tJTO7N7hlvm7YK6slH4zNnZkEZgEnv9wiz4clpuZzMry9ILuZIxzDu4IeqpilVFuPd19C24D9kwU218ttpNOXltbRT75QuoGrGscujCZRoUgk9RAUdC8dzTYh7ZHEqit/M+hFoVb4ScLA0u44b85tSEEPMd2aw=
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hello,

for those that missed it yet:
http://www.gibix.net/projects/nspluginwrapper/

its going to be gpld at some time according to the homepage. dont know
whats worse... using a binary plugin to get a binary plugin going or
installing a 32 bit browser.

maybe interesting info for those that need it though.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl

p.s. i didnt try it myself

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [info] x86_64 32bit binary browser plugin crap
    • From: Neal Becker

• Prev by Date: BGP with FC4
• Next by Date: Re: kernel-update freq
• Previous by thread: BGP with FC4
• Next by thread: Re: [info] x86_64 32bit binary browser plugin crap
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread