Re: named / bind problem

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, dlg@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: named / bind problem
• From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 23:13:48 +1030
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <200511031739.jA3HdA7f011030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <200511031739.jA3HdA7f011030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 09:39 -0800, David L. Gehrt wrote:
> If you have a seriously disrupted serial number.  Setting the serial
> number to "0" and propagating it will allow you to get the slaves back
> in sync.

Hmm, this isn't something I've heard mentioned before.  Does it have a
defined purpose?

-- 
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: named / bind problem
    • From: Les Mikesell

• References:
  • Re: named / bind problem
    • From: David L. Gehrt

• Prev by Date: Re: mail confusion
• Next by Date: Re: wget not resolving domain names
• Previous by thread: Re: named / bind problem
• Next by thread: Re: named / bind problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread