Re: OOo 2.0 and Sun Java 1.5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
> On 11/3/05, Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
> > > Sounds like it might be an OOo problem then, I find it pretty annoying
> > > that the OOo documentation doesn't specify what you're supposed to
> > > point to when adding a JRE...
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the Fedora version of OO.o is patched to work with
> > the GNU runtime.  This may make it incompatible with other JVM's.
> >
> > You might try removing the Fedora packages and downloading the upstream
> > version.
> >
> 
> Ah, I see. Thanks.
> 
> According to Charles Curley it doesn't work if you install the
> upstream RPM's from OOo either though, so it might be something
> else...

What I tried and which did not work was finding the jpackage (fc4
native) JRE with the upstream OOo RPMs. 

Indeed, on my laptop I have the upstream OOo RPMs and Sun's
jdk-1.5.0_01-fcs RPM, and the upstream OOo finds the JRE. So Ian is
correct.


> 
> --
> Tarjei
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

Attachment: pgpXr4TPIROUV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux