Re: OO.o & jre

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: OO.o & jre
• From: Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:22:25 +0000
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=clAf/v5hL9SvBKW3tqdL4R2UtuEIXJ8eiHwI6U2gb/l1ZnGFnPBX3PruD9Ul+hMae2c4wEZtt5WHhgCBeJf+FKTbLi7G7Iq6Kg1ltJ/hzRWoszSumfFtQiEb9QOfbFGcJw6elbdCQIzVUyoUP/tt5B62rZ9DhWJMbCp+BDxJhes=
• In-reply-to: <200511021747.28299.ganesanrajesh@xxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <200511021747.28299.ganesanrajesh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/2/05, G Rajesh <ganesanrajesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> I followed your advice, no avail. If I uninstall OO.o2 and install 104 build,
> it against displays JRE1.5 promptly. When I install OO.o again, only 1.4.2 of
> RH's gcj version is displayed. I find similar problem being posted at
> fedoraforum
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=82974&highlight=java
> But no answer/solution. Can some RH/FC experts help me (us?).
> Regards,
> Rajesh

Another idea, Rajesh: try to install the official OOo 2.0 from

www.openoffice.org

Paul

• References:
  • OO.o & jre
    • From: G Rajesh

• Prev by Date: Re: AW: AW: big Problem with FC 4 and SATA (hdparm error)
• Next by Date: Re: FC4 and Shadow Passwords
• Previous by thread: OO.o & jre
• Next by thread: OO.o & jre
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread